🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 remains one of the most fatal – and significant – dates in thirty years of conflict in this area.

Within the community where events unfolded – the legacy of Bloody Sunday are displayed on the buildings and etched in people's minds.

A protest demonstration was organized on a chilly yet clear period in Derry.

The march was challenging the practice of imprisonment without charges – detaining individuals without legal proceedings – which had been established following three years of conflict.

Troops from the Parachute Regiment fatally wounded thirteen individuals in the Bogside area – which was, and continues to be, a predominantly republican area.

A particular photograph became particularly prominent.

Pictures showed a Catholic priest, Father Daly, displaying a blood-stained white handkerchief while attempting to protect a assembly transporting a teenager, the fatally wounded individual, who had been killed.

Media personnel recorded extensive video on the day.

Documented accounts contains Fr Daly telling a journalist that soldiers "just seemed to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no provocation for the discharge of weapons.

This account of what happened was rejected by the original examination.

The initial inquiry concluded the Army had been shot at first.

During the resolution efforts, the ruling party commissioned another inquiry, following pressure by surviving kin, who said the initial inquiry had been a inadequate investigation.

That year, the conclusion by the investigation said that generally, the military personnel had initiated shooting and that not one of the individuals had been armed.

At that time Prime Minister, David Cameron, apologised in the Parliament – declaring killings were "unjustified and unjustifiable."

Law enforcement began to look into the events.

A military veteran, referred to as the defendant, was brought to trial for killing.

He was charged regarding the killings of James Wray, in his twenties, and 26-year-old the second individual.

The accused was additionally charged of trying to kill Patrick O'Donnell, other civilians, more people, another person, and an unidentified individual.

There is a legal order maintaining the veteran's identity protection, which his lawyers have claimed is required because he is at risk of attack.

He told the examination that he had only fired at persons who were carrying weapons.

That claim was disputed in the concluding document.

Information from the inquiry was unable to be used immediately as evidence in the legal proceedings.

In the dock, the accused was screened from view behind a blue curtain.

He spoke for the opening instance in the proceedings at a session in late 2024, to reply "not guilty" when the accusations were read.

Family members of the deceased on the incident made the trip from the city to the judicial building every day of the proceedings.

A family member, whose brother Michael was killed, said they were aware that listening to the proceedings would be painful.

"I visualize the events in my mind's eye," the relative said, as we examined the key areas mentioned in the case – from the location, where Michael was fatally wounded, to the adjoining the courtyard, where the individual and another victim were died.

"It returns me to my position that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and put him in the medical transport.

"I went through the entire event during the testimony.

"Despite enduring all that – it's still valuable for me."